||
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/67932/679328c6d65ee9a753b8198ed6e0da06a9204b6a" alt="NCAA Football: Rutgers at Penn State"
All the numbers behind this week’s attempt at a bounceback conference win.
No. 12 Penn St. Nittany Lions (8-2; 5-2 Big Ten East) vs Rutgers Scarlet Knights (6-4, 3-4 Big Ten East)
12:00 p.m. ET, November 18, 2023—FS1
Beaver Stadium (Capacity: 106,572 / University Park, PA)
Penn State | Value (Nat'l Rank) | Value (Nat'l Rank) | Rutgers | Advantage |
---|---|---|---|---|
Rushing Offense (ypg) | 172.3 (45) | 128.2 (38) | Rushing Defense (ypg) | Push |
Passing Offense (ypg) | 206.1 (88) | 166.2 (9) | Passing Defense (ypg) | [TAG1] [TAG1] [TAG1] |
Pass Efficiency | 136.46 (60) | 113.54 (13) | Pass Efficiency Defense | [TAG1] |
Total Offense (ypg) | 378.4 (72) | 294.4 (13) | Total Defense (ypg) | [TAG1] [TAG1] |
Scoring Offense (ppg) | 37.7 (15) | 18.3 (19) | Scoring Defense (ppg) | Push |
Rushing Defense (ypg) | 77.2 (2) | 169.6 (T - 49) | Rushing Offense (ypg) | [TAG7] |
Passing Defense (ypg) | 162.5 (T - 7) | 140.9 (125) | Passing Offense (ypg) | [TAG7] [TAG7] [TAG7] [TAG7] |
Pass Efficiency Defense | 110.49 (10) | 108.32 (122) | Pass Efficiency | [TAG7] [TAG7] [TAG7] [TAG7] |
Total Defense (ypg) | 239.7 (2) | 310.5 (116) | Total Offense (ypg) | [TAG7] [TAG7] [TAG7] [TAG7] |
Scoring Defense (ppg) | 13.1 (4) | 24.1 (T - 85) | Scoring Offense (ppg) | [TAG7] [TAG7] [TAG7] |
Punt Return Defense (ypr) | 4.72 (28) | -.2 (130) | Punt Return Yds (ypr) | [TAG7] [TAG7] [TAG7] [TAG7] |
Punt Return Yds (ypr) | 11.17 (33) | 6.25 (T - 50) | Punt Return Defense (ypr) | Push |
Net Punting Yds (ypp) | 42.02 (13) | 38.67 (68) | Net Punting Yds (ypp) | [TAG7] [TAG7] |
Kickoff Return Yds (ypr) | 24.07 (18) | 14.9 (9) | Kickoff Return Defense (ypr) | Push |
Kickoff Return Defense (ypr) | 16.93 (23) | 36.67 (1) | Kickoff Return Yds (ypr) | Push |
Turnover Margin | +1.5 (1) | +.5 (T - 26) | Turnover Margin | [TAG7] |
Passes Had Intercepted (total) | 1 (1) | 7 (T - 81) | Passes Intercepted (total) | [TAG7] [TAG7] [TAG7] |
Passes Intercepted (total) | 10 (T - 32) | 6 (T - 24) | Passes Had Intercepted (total) | Push |
Penalty Yds/Game | 48.1 (48) | 40.1 (15) | Penalty Yds/Game | [TAG1] |
Sacks (spg) | 3.8 (T - 2) | .9 (T - 7) | Sacks Allowed (spg) | Push |
Sacks Allowed (spg) | 1.3 (T - 19) | 1.8 (T - 94) | Sacks (spg) | [TAG7] [TAG7] [TAG7] |
Tackles for Loss (tpg) | 8.2 (4) | 3.6 (T - 5) | Tackles for Loss Allowed (tpg) | Push |
Tackles for Loss Allowed (tpg) | 4.1 (T - 14) | 4.0 (124) | Tackles for Loss (tpg) | [TAG7] [TAG7] [TAG7] [TAG7] |
Redzone Offense (% season) | 96.0% (4) | 71.9% (7) | Redzone Defense (% season) | Push |
Redzone Defense (% season) | 88.9% (T - 100) | 82.9% (76) | Redzone Offense (% season) | Push |
Redzone TD % (season) | 78.0% | 56.25% | Redzone TD % Defense (season) | Push |
Redzone TD % Defense (season) | 55.56% | 62.86% | Redzone TD % (season) | [TAG7] |
3rd Down Conv. % (season) | 40.9% (T - 53) | 39.1% (T - 68) | 3rd Down Defense % (season) | Push |
3rd Down Defense % (season) | 30.4% (16) | 36.0% (T - 92) | 3rd Down Conv. % (season) | [TAG7] [TAG7] [TAG7] |
4th Down Conv. % (season) | 81.8% (3) | 54.2% (87) | 4th Down Defense % (season) | [TAG7] [TAG7] [TAG7] |
4th Down Defense % (season) | 43.8% (T - 39) | 65.0% (T - 28) | 4th Down Conv. % (season) | Push |
1st Downs (season) | 232 (21) | 177 (30) | 1st Downs Allowed (season) | Push |
1st Downs Allowed (season) | 133 (2) | 177 (T - 100) | 1st Downs (season) | [TAG7] [TAG7] [TAG7] |
Time of Possession (mpg) | 33 (7) | 31 (35) | Time of Possession (mpg) | [TAG7] |
Strength of Schedule | 59 | 10 | Strength of Schedule | [TAG1] |
Difference >25 in National Rank = [TAG7]
Difference >50 in National Rank = [TAG7][TAG7]
Note:
All of the above rankings are taken directly from the NCAA except for strength of schedule, which is taken from Power Rankings.
The Redzone TD% and Redzone TD% Defense are calculated by me and not ranked by the NCAA. Determining who has the advantage in these categories is strictly my arbitrary judgment.
Quick thoughts:
Another single digit loss to a likely college football playoff team, and what follows? Another Big Ten game against a team that has a losing record in the conference. This time, though, it’s a Rutgers squad that’s playing very tough defense under Greg Schiano - and the Scarlet Knights are already bowl-eligible.
They’ve got a hard-nosed defense but their offense and special teams still lack some oomph and there’s a real area of opportunity for Penn State to grind RU down and win by significant digits by the end of the day.
A few points on the numbers:
- Penn State is 61 of 149 on third downs, while Rutgers is 45 of 125 on third downs (almost 25 more third down attempts for the home team)
- PSU opponents are 41 of 135 on third downs, and RU opponents are 54 of 138 on third downs
- The Nittany Lions are 18 of 22 on fourth downs, while the Scarlet Knights are 13 of 20. The Lions’ opponents have attempted 16 fourth downs and converted 7; the Nights’ opponents have attempted 24 fourth downs and converted 13
- Penn State has scored on 48 of their 50 red zone possessions with 39 touchdowns; Rutgers has scored on 29 of their 35 red zone possessions with 22 touchdowns
- PSU’s defense still has allowed the second fewest red zone attempts in the country with 18, and allowed 16 scores (just ten touchdowns); RU’s defense have scored on 23 of 32 red zone possessions, with eighteen touchdowns
- Rutgers’ special teams unit have forced only four punt returns (fourth fewest in the nation), while Penn State’s opponents have returned 18 punts
- The Nittany Lions have returned 23 punts; the Scarlet Knights have returned 5 and are the only team in the nation with a negative punt return average on the year now
- PSU has punted 41 times with only one touchback; RU has punted 45 times also with only one touchback
- Rutgers has the fewest kickoff returns in the nation with 3; Penn State has returned 14 points
- RU opponents have returned 10 kickoffs with 33 touchbacks; PSU opponents have returned 14 kickoffs with 45 touchbacks
--------------------------------
By: Cari Greene
Title: Just the Stats: No. 12 Penn State vs Rutgers
Sourced From: www.blackshoediaries.com/2023/11/15/23960008/penn-state-football-just-the-stats-vs-rutgers-all-the-defense-low-scoring-new-offense-ranked
Published Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2023 14:55:00 +0000